Wednesday, October 24, 2018

Gary Shilling on the Fed Tightening and Emerging Economies dollar denominated debts

Click here if the above video does not play

Monday, October 15, 2018

Oil prices may fall in the long term

Gary Shilling thinks oil prices may have peaked.

Crude oil prices, both Brent and West Texas Intermediate, are at four-year highs. Traders are talking about a return to $100 per barrel, and even higher. But if you’re a long-term investor, look for oil demand to peak and more subdued prices in the years ahead — not the supply shortages and soaring petroleum costs as some observers fear. Royal Dutch Shell Plc and Norway’s Statoil ASA expect the peak in demand as soon as the mid-2020s, while BP Plc sees it happening between 2035 and 2040 and the International Energy Agency is forecasting 2040.

What a switch from the days of M. King Hubbert, the geophysicist at Shell Oil in the late 1940s who believed that oil field production followed the classical bell curve or normal distribution. He predicted that production in the lower 48 U.S. states would top out in the early 1970s with dire economic consequences. Few agreed at the time, but Hubbert proved largely correct, and his adherents subsequently extended his concepts globally and believed that worldwide production would top out in 2010 or 2012 at the latest.

Nevertheless, oil supplies have proved plentiful in recent years as output surged from Russia, Canadian oil sands and, especially, U.S. frackers. This troubles OPEC, which, like any cartel, exists only to keep prices above equilibrium. That encourages producers in and outside the cartel to strive for more market share. So OPEC, led by Saudi Arabia, has tended to curb its own production to accommodate these “cheaters.”

In 2014, OPEC was frustrated that all the growth in global output in the previous decade was going to non-OPEC producers. To teach the “cheaters” a lesson, it hyped its output from 30 million barrels per day to 33.8 million barrels daily. Prices fell to $27 per barrel, but that didn’t chase out American’s increasingly efficient frackers that now dominate U.S. production. As of August, American shale output was 7.7 million barrels per day, versus 3.3 million barrels from conventional oil. America is now the largest producer of crude oil, topping Russia and Saudi Arabia, and production may only rise as temporary pipeline shortages are overcome, allowing U.S. exports to increase.

Elsewhere, Mexico privatized its deep-water oil reserves in 2015, and output should climb. Brazil has liberalized its oil market, opening its colossal deep-water potential to foreign oil companies. North Sea output is reviving. Fracking for oil is being developed in the Persian Gulf, Argentina, Canada, Russia and China.

Oil will be in surplus in future years not only due to increasing output potential, but also because of rising supplies of natural gas, which has also been made abundant by fracking. American gas, after being cooled and converted to liquefied natural gas, has huge export potential along with LNG from Oman, Australia and elsewhere. Then there’s renewable sources such as wind, solar and biofuel to consider. These accounted for only 12 percent of electricity generation last year but the IEA believes they will make up 56 percent of net generating added capacity through 2025.

The cost of renewables is declining. A U.S. residential solar energy installation now costs $2.93 per watt on average, down from $6.61 in 2010. For a large utility-scale system, the cost has dropped from $3.58 to $1.11 — a plunge of almost 70 percent. Costs are falling for batteries and other methods of storing solar energy at night and wind energy on calm days. Nevertheless, necessary government subsidies for renewables are still substantial.

Continuing energy conservation will also reduce crude oil demand. Since 1970, energy consumption per U.S. dollar of economic activity has dropped 61 percent in the U.S., 48 percent in Japan, 70 percent in the U.K. and 43 percent in Canada. California just enacted a mandate for carbon-free — fossil fuel-free — electricity by 2045.

While the Trump administration is capping fuel-efficiency standards for autos at 37 miles per gallon, down from the Obama administration’s 54.5 miles per gallon by 2025, electric vehicle sales are surging and will further curb gasoline demand. Transportation fuel accounts for half of crude oil use and autos consume half of that, or 25 percent of total oil demand.

Then there are the millennials who eschew driver’s licenses in favor of bikes. And aging postwar babies are being forced to give up driving. In addition, emerging-market economies that binged on borrowing in dollars after the financial crisis to finance growth and oil demand now find themselves strained as the robust dollar makes it much more expensive to service those debts in local currency terms. Since most commodities trade in dollars, their local currency costs of commodity imports, especially oil, are rising as well, and curbing oil demand.

As economies grow, be they developed like the U.S. or developing such as China, services gain a bigger share of spending while spending on goods fall. That’s another long-term deterrent to oil demand and the energy needed to produce goods.


Tuesday, October 2, 2018

US will win the Trade war | The Buyer has power over the Seller


See below for Transcript from Business Insider video

Here's the point that I continue to make. When you've got plenty of supply in the world, and I think you do — plenty of industrial capability, plenty of raw materials and so on — it's the buyer that has the upper hand not the seller. The buyer has the ultimate power and who's the buyer? US is the buyer, China is the seller. And besides that, if you say, if we weren't buying all those consumer goods from China, and you and I enjoy them, they're cheap, they're great. But if we weren't buying them, where would China sell them? They have no other place to sell them, and in the meanwhile, China's growth is slowing.

They've got a problem of huge debt expansion they're trying to curb, they're trying to deal with a shadow lending — a shadow banking system and so on and so forth. China isn't going to collapse obviously, but I think in this trade war, that the US has the upper hand.

If you look at how this whole thing developed, after World War II, the rest of the world was pretty much in ashes and we were promptly into the Cold War, so I think that implicitly or explicitly, we basically said, "We will let Japan and Europe export freely into the US," because that gave them the growth to revive in a postwar era and that was cheaper for us than garrisoning even more US troops around the world and having more border wars. Well, that was fine, but that era's over, and globalization has replaced it, so it's an entirely different scene, and I think as a result, you have this situation where China — China, you know, grew basically through exports and they went to Europe and North America.

But you know, they did it with some rather underhanded — we'd let them into the World Trade Center in 2001 and they basically have not fulfilled their promises, they have not opened up their technology, they're not opening up to our investments, they steal our technology, they demand tech transfers for companies that want to operate in China and so on. And so you've got a situation now where China is basically playing by the old game, when everybody could export to the US, but now when you see the unemployment problem, no growth and purchasing power for the average guy — the non-supervisory and production employees — no growth in real incomes for a decade and that has changed the whole scene and I think that's really what has gotten Trump elected and he's basically saying, "Hey wait a minute. We've got the upper hand here and we're going to go ahead."

I mean, people say nobody wins trade wars. Yeah, in the short-run you don't, but in the long-run ... the US will be better off.

Now, they could go to the mat. Xi, who is basically the president for life in China, and Trump, he won't be around forever of course, but they could go to the mat and you could get a really nasty, all-out trade war and a serious global recession. I'm not predicting that. I think they probably will settle and China will begrudgingly give ground. They'll import more US goods, they'll ease up on required tech transfers, steal less of it. They're not going to change their views entirely, but I think under pressure, they probably will give way and we'll end up winning the trade war.

I mean, people say nobody wins trade wars. Yeah, in the short-run you don't, but in the long-run, if it's a matter of changing what has been the world exporting to the US and the US buying it and what do we do? We give them paper. That's why they own half of our treasuries. I think that is being reversed and in the long-run, the US will be better off.